The Fate of Formal Lithostratigraphy

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hollis D. Hedberg, the first chairman of the International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification (ISSC), compiled and published the International Stratigraphic Guide (ISG) in 1976 after a long and successful endeavour. The guide contains definitions, procedures, terminology, and nomenclature, with detailed information on three stratigraphic categories, including that of lithostratigraphy. In the definition of a lithostratigraphic unit, it was stated that “a lithostratigraphic unit may consist of sedimentary, or igneous, or metamorphic rocks, or an association of two or more of these.” Salvador (1994) suggested an alternative definition of lithostratigraphic terminology under the F4 subheading. It more obviously occurs in the North American and the Australian stratigraphic codes. The result is that national guides or codes and practice vary, and the correlation of lithostratigraphic units is unsolved, which is also expressed in geological maps. It is high time that the reconsideration of lithostratigraphic terminology was put on the agenda of the ISSC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Csaszar, G. (2014). The Fate of Formal Lithostratigraphy. In Springer Geology (pp. 3–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04364-7_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free