Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by us state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic review

99Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there may be too few ventilators to meet medical demands. It is unknown how many US states have ventilator allocation guidelines and how these state guidelines compare with one another. Objective: To evaluate the number of publicly available US state guidelines for ventilator allocation and the variation in state recommendations for how ventilator allocation decisions should occur and to assess whether unique criteria exist for pediatric patients. Evidence Review: This systematic review evaluated publicly available guidelines about ventilator allocation for all states in the US and in the District of Columbia using department of health websites for each state and internet searches. Documents with any discussion of a process to triage mechanical ventilatory support during a public health emergency were screened for inclusion. Articles were excluded if they did not include specific ventilator allocation recommendations, were in draft status, did not include their state department of health, or were not the most up-to-date guideline. All documents were individually assessed and reassessed by 2 independent reviewers from March 30 to April 2 and May 8 to 10, 2020. Findings: As of May 10, 2020, 26 states had publicly available ventilator guidelines, and 14 states had pediatric guidelines. Use of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in the initial rank of adult patients was recommended in 15 state guidelines (58%), and assessment of limited life expectancy from underlying conditions or comorbidities was included in 6 state guidelines (23%). Priority was recommended for specific groups in the initial evaluation of patients in 6 states (23%) (ie, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Utah). Many states recommended exclusion criteria in adult (11 of 26 states [42%]) and pediatric (10 of 14 states [71%]) ventilator allocation. Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation from a patient to give to another if a shortage occurs was discussed in 22 of 26 adult guidelines (85%) and 9 of 14 pediatric guidelines (64%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that although allocation guidelines for mechanical ventilatory support are essential in a public health emergency, only 26 US states provided public guidance on how this allocation should occur. Guidelines among states, including adjacent states, varied significantly and could cause inequity in the allocation of mechanical ventilatory support during a public health emergency, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

References Powered by Scopus

A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds during the COVID-19 Pandemic

595Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The toughest triage — Allocating ventilators in a pandemic

545Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic

275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mitigating inequities and saving lives with ICU triage during the COVID-19 pandemic

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rationing, racism and justice: Advancing the debate around "colourblind' COVID-19 ventilator allocation

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

COVID-19 double jeopardy: the overwhelming impact of the social determinants of health

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piscitello, G. M., Kapania, E. M., Miller, W. D., Rojas, J. C., Siegler, M., & Parker, W. F. (2020, June 19). Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by us state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic review. JAMA Network Open. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

48%

Researcher 15

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 45

66%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

21%

Social Sciences 5

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 8

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0