A retrospective cohort study of anterior half peroneus longus tendon vs hamstring tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A minimum 3-years follow-up

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon (AHPLT) has recently gained popularity to become the alternate graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to its acceptable biomechanical properties, easy and safe to harvest. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to compare the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with AHPLT and hamstring graft at the minimum of 3 years follow-up. Knee stability, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and Tegner activity level were collected. Results: There was no clinical significance regarding physical examination. Postoperative IKDC score was higher in the hamstring group compared with AHPLT group. Multiple regression analysis was done. The parsimonious model revealed graft types and gender were the most optimal variables explained postoperative IKDC score. Conclusion: AHPLT graft can be an alternative choice to conventional graft for single anatomic ACL reconstruction with less donor site morbidity, however there must be concern for smaller graft in short and thin female patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunadham, U., & Woratanarat, P. (2022). A retrospective cohort study of anterior half peroneus longus tendon vs hamstring tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A minimum 3-years follow-up. Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221085722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free