EAST-LC: Randomized controlled phase III trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had received a platinum-based treatment

  • Nishio M
  • Mok T
  • Nakagawa K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Two phase II studies had evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1, an oral 5-FU, in patients with previously treated NSCLC. The results of these studies suggested that S-1 was comparable to the docetaxel (DOC), a standard therapy for previously treated NSCLC. This randomized phase III study aims to establish non-inferiority of S-1 monotherapy to DOC in patients with previously treated NSCLC in Asia. Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received at least 1 regimen of platinum-based chemotherapy with/without prior exposure to gefitinib or erlotinib were eligible. Patients were randomized to S-1 (80-120 mg/day on days 1-28 every 42-day) or DOC (60 mg/m2 in Japan, 75 mg/m2 in other countries, on day 1 every 21days). The primary objective was to evaluate whether S-1 is non-inferior to DOC in terms of overall survival (OS) (upper CI limit for HR < 1.2). Secondary objectives include progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR), quality of life, and safety. Results Total of 1154 patients were enrolled from 7/2010 to 6/2014; and median follow-up time was 30.75 months. The median OS of the S-1 group was non-inferior to the DOC group (12.75 months versus 12.52 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.945; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.833-1.073; P =0.3818). Subgroup analysis by country (Japan vs non-Japan) is summarized in Table. PFS was also similar between the two groups (2.86 months versus 2.89 months). Grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and neutropenia were higher in the DOC group (0.9%vs 13.6%; 5.4% vs 47.7% in S1 and DOC group, respective). Other non-hematoloic toxicities in S1 and DOC group are as followed; diarrhea (37.2% versus 18.2%), stomatitis (23.9% versus 14.5%) and decreased appetite (52.6% versus 37.9%), respectively. Japan Non-Japan DOC S-1 DOC S-1 No of Pt 359 361 211 216 MST(m) 12.6 13.4 12.1 10.8 HR (95%CI) 0.922 (0.789-1.079) 1.056 (0.854-1.307) Interaction test P value 0.3374 Conclusions S-1 is non-inferior to DOC in terms of OS, with tolerable toxicity. S-1 monotherapy is one of the treatment options for patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nishio, M., Mok, T. S. K., Nakagawa, K., Yamamoto, N., Shi, Y.-K., Zhang, L., … Tamura, T. (2016). EAST-LC: Randomized controlled phase III trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had received a platinum-based treatment. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi421. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw383.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free