After the publication of the article [1], it was brought to our attention that some of the data in Table 2 were incorrect. Please find a correct and updated version of Table 2 in the erratum. Following this Fig. 1 has also been updated; the correct version of Fig. 1 is given in thiserratum. Also, during the calculation of specific glucose uptake rate, the authors mistakenly used the unit mmol/L as mmol, and therefore it caused some errors in the calculations of production rate (Table 2) and ATP regeneration rate (Section "Flux balance analysis" [1]) which need to be corrected. The corrected ATP regeneration rates are 0.02 and 0.38 mmolATP/(gCDW h) for [Co(bpy)3](ClO4)2 from glucose oxidation and membrane-bound ATP synthase respectively, while those numbers for K3[Fe(CN)6] are 0.05 and 0.64 mmolATP/(gCDW h), respectively. (Table Presented).
CITATION STYLE
Erratum: Anoxic metabolism and biochemical production in Pseudomonas putida F1 driven by a bioelectrochemical system (Biotechnology for Biofuels (2016) 9 (39) DOI: 10.1186/s13068?016?0452?y). (2017, June 19). Biotechnology for Biofuels. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0843-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.