Thought Leader Comparisons of Risks in Precision Medicine Research

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Biomedical research is increasingly capitalizing on an array of data to illuminate the interplay between “omics,” lifestyle, and health. Leveraging this information presents opportunities to advance knowledge but also poses risks to research participants. In interviews with thought leaders, we asked which data type associated with a hypothetical precision medicine research endeavor was riskiest: 42% chose ongoing access to electronic health records, 17% chose genomic analyses of biospecimens, and 15% chose streaming data from mobile devices. Other responses included “It depends” (15%), the three types are equally risky (8%), and the combination of data types together is riskiest (3%). When asked to consider the hypothetical study overall, 60% rated the likelihood of the risks materializing as low, but 20% rated the potential consequences as severe. These results have implications for study design and informed consent, including placing appropriate emphasis on the risks and protections for the full range of data.

References Powered by Scopus

How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

11941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis

1280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The "all of us" research program

1114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Utility and Diversity: Challenges for Genomic Medicine

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Federated Analysis for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: A Technical and Legal Primer

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current ethical and social issues in epidemiology

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beskow, L. M., Hammack-Aviran, C. M., & Brelsford, K. M. (2020). Thought Leader Comparisons of Risks in Precision Medicine Research. Ethics and Human Research, 42(6), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500059

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 4

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

29%

Materials Science 1

14%

Sports and Recreations 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0