Automatic classification of drum sounds: A comparison of feature selection methods and classification techniques

54Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present a comparative evaluation of automatic classification of a sound database containing more than six hundred drum sounds (kick, snare, hihat, toms and cymbals). A preliminary set of fifty descriptors has been refined with the help of different techniques and some final reduced sets including around twenty features have been selected as the most relevant. We have then tested different classification techniques (instance-based, statistical-based, and tree-based) using ten-fold cross-validation. Three levels of taxonomic classification have been tested: membranes versus plates (super-category level), kick vs. snare vs. hihat vs. toms vs. cymbals (basic level), and some basic classes (kick and snare) plus some sub-classes -i.e. ride, crash, open-hihat, closed hihat, high-tom, medium-tom, low-tom- (sub-category level). Very high hit-rates have been achieved (99%, 97%, and 90% respectively) with several of the tested techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herrera, P., Yeterian, A., & Gouyon, F. (2002). Automatic classification of drum sounds: A comparison of feature selection methods and classification techniques. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2445, pp. 69–80). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45722-4_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free