A clinical decision support system prototype for cardiovascular intensive care

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper describes the development and validation of a decision-support system prototype that can help manage hypovolemic hypotension in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU). The prototype uses physiologic pattern-matching, therapeutic protocols, computational drug-dosage response modeling and expert reasoning heuristics in its selection of intervention strategies and choices. As part of model testing, the prototype simulated real-time operation by processing historical physiologic and intervention data on a patient sequentially, generating alerts on questionable data, critiques of interventions instituted and recommendations on preferred interventions. Bench-testing with 399 interventions from 13 historical cases showed therapies for bleeding and fluid replacement proposed by the prototype were significantly more consistent (p<0.0001) than those instituted by the staff when compared against expert critiques (80% versus 44%). This study has demonstrated the feasibility of formalizing hemodynamic management of CVICU patients in a manner that may be implemented and evaluated in a clinical setting. © 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

References Powered by Scopus

Computerized Surveillance of Adverse Drug Events in Hospital Patients

641Citations
151Readers
Get full text
76Citations
20Readers

Decision support alerts for clinical laboratory and blood gas data

32Citations
10Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lau, F. (1994). A clinical decision support system prototype for cardiovascular intensive care. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 11(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132364

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

43%

Computer Science 4

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

21%

Decision Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0