Malingering in mild traumatic brain injury

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and its congnitive sequelae (or lack thereof) are a source of controversy within the field of neurcpsychology. A primary reason for this controversy is that research examining neurocongi- tive function in mTBI historically has failed to include performance validity tests (PVTs), which resulted in individuals not performing to true capability being retained in study samples. This chapter summarizes newer research on cognitive outcome in mTBI, and illustrates use of miltiple PVTs and personality test data in the identification of noncredible test takers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cottingham, M. E., & Boone, K. B. (2014). Malingering in mild traumatic brain injury. In Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Traumatic Brain Injury (pp. 371–388). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0784-7_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free