Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly

13Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility and validity of the 50-m walking test. [Subjects] Reproducibility was investigated in 19 community-dwelling elderly women (mean age, 76.3 years), and validity was investigated in 31 community-dwelling elderly individuals (12 men and 19 women; mean age, 75.7 years). [Methods] The time taken to walk 50 m, the time taken to walk each 10-m section (laps 1–5), the time taken to walk 10 m, and grip strength were measured. In addition, the functional reach test (FRT), one-leg standing test, and timed up and go (TUG) test were performed. [Results] In a reproducibility analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was 0.97. In a Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic error was found. The measured values from the 50-m walking test included a measurement error of 1.5 s, and the acceptable margin of error was confirmed to be 3.1 s. In a validity analysis, the 50-m walking test score was significantly correlated with the 10-m walking and TUG test scores. [Conclusion] Our results suggest that the 50-m walking test score may be a useful index of the walking ability of community-dwelling elderly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hachiya, M., Murata, S., Otao, H., Kamijou, K., Mizota, K., & Asami, T. (2015). Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(5), 1511–1514. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free