Writing Transitional Justice: An Empirical Evaluation of Transitional Justice Scholarship in Academic Journals

19Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines transitional justice scholarship published in academic periodicals over a six-year period, 2003-2008, to identify the disciplines that contributed to the literature and the nature of scholarly questions they posed during a period of burgeoning scholarship. The article is the first to identify empirically which disciplines contributed to the scholarship and which were most influential among the social sciences and humanities. Law, political science, and sociology are the disciplines that dominated the field as reflected in academic journals. The most influential transitional justice articles in the social sciences and law suggested that readers were drawn to scholarly treatments that theorized the field or were analytical in nature. Scholars were wrestling with basic questions with regard to what transitional justice is and how it works. This historical perspective establishes a baseline from which to examine ongoing and future research and writing in transitional justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2015). Writing Transitional Justice: An Empirical Evaluation of Transitional Justice Scholarship in Academic Journals. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free