Reconnecting knowledge utilization and evaluation utilization domains of inquiry

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article provides commentary for the thematic segment titled "Applying a variety of methods to the evaluation of various efforts aimed at transferring knowledge generated from research." The authors revisit arguments supporting inquiry that takes up the challenge of connecting cognate fields of evaluation utilization and the broader domain of knowledge utilization. The central contribution of each of the foregoing articles is identified and situated within the context of ongoing inquiry in this domain. © 2009 Canadian Evaluation Society.

References Powered by Scopus

Research on the utilization of evaluations: A Review and Synthesis

247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research utilization: The state of the art

171Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimizing use in the field of program evaluation by integrating learning from the knowledge field

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a definition of evaluation within the Canadian context: Who knew this would be so difficult?

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amo, C., & Cousins, J. B. (2008). Reconnecting knowledge utilization and evaluation utilization domains of inquiry. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.023.007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

90%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

58%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

17%

Arts and Humanities 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free