Contesting the Curriculum: Counsellor Education in a Postmodern and Medicalising Era

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The psychiatric classification system of DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version 5) has become a default commercial and scientific language for helping professionals, especially when it is coupled with evidence-based interventions for addressing human concerns that are understood as diagnosed disorders. Counsellors, however, have traditionally responded - conversationally - to their clients' concerns by drawing from diverse discourses of practice. This is even more the case now that the field of counselling offers popular new postmodern approaches. Tensions between these medicalising developments, pluralistic traditions and postmodern sensitivities in counselling make counsellor education an interesting context of study. From critical document and website reviews, the authors use situational analysis to map medicalising tensions to shape contemporary counsellor education. Their aim is to draw attention to how curricular tensions associated with DSM-5 use may challenge the pluralism that has long been associated with counselling and counsellor education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strong, T., Ross, K. H., Chondros, K., & Sesma-Vazquez, M. (2015). Contesting the Curriculum: Counsellor Education in a Postmodern and Medicalising Era. In Critical Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis and Counselling: Implications for Practice (pp. 241–263). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460585_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free