An Updated Overview of Existing Cancer Databases and Identified Needs

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our search of existing cancer databases aimed to assess the current landscape and identify key needs. We analyzed 71 databases, focusing on genomics, proteomics, lipidomics, and glycomics. We found a lack of cancer-related lipidomic and glycomic databases, indicating a need for further development in these areas. Proteomic databases dedicated to cancer research were also limited. To assess overall progress, we included human non-cancer databases in proteomics, lipidomics, and glycomics for comparison. This provided insights into advancements in these fields over the past eight years. We also analyzed other types of cancer databases, such as clinical trial databases and web servers. Evaluating user-friendliness, we used the FAIRness principle to assess findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. This ensured databases were easily accessible and usable. Our search summary highlights significant growth in cancer databases while identifying gaps and needs. These insights are valuable for researchers, clinicians, and database developers, guiding efforts to enhance accessibility, integration, and usability. Addressing these needs will support advancements in cancer research and benefit the wider cancer community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Austin, B. K., Firooz, A., Valafar, H., & Blenda, A. V. (2023, August 1). An Updated Overview of Existing Cancer Databases and Identified Needs. Biology. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12081152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free