Diagnostic performance of blood pressure measurement modalities in living kidney donor candidates

8Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and objectives Precise BP measurement to exclude hypertension is critical in evaluating potential living kidney donors. Ambulatory BP monitoring is considered the gold standard method for diagnosing hypertension, but it is cumbersome to perform. We sought to determine whether lower BP cutoffs using office and automated BP would reduce the rate of missed hypertension in potential living donors. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Wemeasured BP in 578 prospective donors using three modalities: (1) single office BP, (2) office automated BP (average of five consecutive automated readings separated by 1 minute), and (3) ambulatory BP. Daytime ambulatory BP was considered the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension. We assessed both the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) definitions of hypertension in the cohort. Empirical thresholds of office BP and automated BP for the detection of ambulatory BP-diagnosed hypertensionwere derived using Youden index, which maximizes the sum of sensitivity and specificity and gives equal weight to false positive and false negative values. Results Hypertension was diagnosed in 90 (16%) prospective donors by JNC-7 criteria and 198 (34%) prospective donors by ACC/AHA criteria. Masked hypertension was found in 3% of the total cohort by JNC-7 using the combination of office or automated BP, and it was seen in 24% by ACC/AHA guidelines. Using Youden index, cutoffs were derived for both office and automated BP using JNC-7 (<123/82 and <120/78 mm Hg) and ACC/ AHA (<119/79 and <116/76 mm Hg) definitions. Using these lower cutoffs, the sensitivity for detecting hypertension improved from 79%to 87%for JNC-7 and from 32% to 87% by ACC/AHA definition, with negative predictive values of 95% and 87%, respectively. Missed (masked) hypertension was reduced to 2% and 4% of the entire cohort by JNC-7and ACC/AHA, respectively. Conclusions The prevalence of hypertension was higher in living donor candidates using ACC/AHA compared JNC-7 definitions. Lower BP cutoffs in the clinic improved sensitivity and led to a low overall prevalence of missed hypertension in prospective living kidney donors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armanyous, S., Ohashi, Y., Lioudis, M., Schold, J. D., Thomas, G., Poggio, E. D., & Augustine, J. J. (2019). Diagnostic performance of blood pressure measurement modalities in living kidney donor candidates. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 14(5), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02780218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free