EFL writing assessment: Peer assessment vs. automated essay scoring

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to explore problems and potentials of new technologies in English as foreign language (EFL) writing education. Forty-six students as a foreign language (EFL) learners in a Chinese university participated in this study. They submitted their draft to Pigai Network and Scholar Network separately and received automated essay scoring (AES) and peer assessment (PA) feedback. Results showed a moderate, positive partial correlation between PA and AES, controlling for performance level. The EFL learners in China preferred AES over PA. These findings raise several relevant issues in how to improve peer assessment feedback effectively, such as writing rubric in peer assessment, specialized peer assessment tool, technology assistant and peer feedback.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, M., Deng, Q., & Yang, M. (2020). EFL writing assessment: Peer assessment vs. automated essay scoring. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11984 LNCS, pp. 21–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38778-5_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free