Responses of human elbow flexor muscles to electrically stimulated forced lengthening exercise

56Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study developed an electrical stimulation model for human elbow flexors to examine eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage and adaptation. Male students (n = 17) were randomly placed into one of two groups; isometric (ES-ISO, n = 8) and eccentric (ES-ECC, n = 9). The elbow joint was fixed at 90° (1.57 rad) and the elbow flexors stimulated percutaneously by an electronic muscle stimulator for 5 s through two electrodes placed over the muscles for ES-ISO. In ES-ECC, the muscles were stimulated similarly to the ES-ISO, but the elbow joint was forcibly extended from an elbow flexed (90° 1.57 rad) to a full-extended position (180°, 3.14 rad) in 3 s. Maximal voluntary isometric force, range of motion, upper arm circumference, muscle thickness by ultrasonography, muscle soreness, plasma creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activities were assessed before and for 4 days after exercise. ES-ECC produced significantly larger changes in all criterion measures compared with ES-ISO (P < 0.01). These findings confirmed that eccentric muscle actions induced muscle damage, but isometric contractions resulted in little or no damage. Six subjects from the ES-ECC group repeated the same eccentric exercise (ECC2) 2 weeks after the first bout (ECC1), and changes in the criterion measures were compared between the bouts. Changes in all criterion measures after ECC2 were significantly smaller than ECC1 (P < 0.01). These results suggest that the first eccentric exercise produced a protective effect against muscle damage in the subsequent eccentric exercise bout, which does not involve adaptations in the central nervous system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nosaka, K., Newton, M., & Sacco, P. (2002). Responses of human elbow flexor muscles to electrically stimulated forced lengthening exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 174(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.2002.00936.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free