Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams

8Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Debriefing is an essential skill for simulation educators and feedback for debriefers is recognised as important in progression to mastery. Existing assessment tools, such as the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), may assist in rating performance but their utility is limited by subjectivity and complexity. Use of quantitative data measurements for feedback has been shown to improve performance of clinicians but has not been studied as a focus for debriefer feedback. Methods: A multi-centre sample of interdisciplinary debriefings was observed. Total debriefing time, length of individual contributions and demographics were recorded. DASH scores from simulation participants, debriefers and supervising faculty were collected after each event. Conversational diagrams were drawn in real-time by supervising faculty using an approach described by Dieckmann. For each debriefing, the data points listed above were compiled on a single page and then used as a focus for feedback to the debriefer. Results: Twelve debriefings were included (µ = 6.5 simulation participants per event). Debriefers receiving feedback from supervising faculty were physicians or nurses with a range of experience (n = 7). In 9/12 cases the ratio of debriefer to simulation participant contribution length was ≧ 1:1. The diagrams for these debriefings typically resembled a fan-shape. Debriefings (n = 3) with a ratio < 1:1 received higher DASH ratings compared with the ≧ 1:1 group (p = 0.038). These debriefings generated star-shaped diagrams. Debriefer self-rated DASH scores (µ = 5.08/7.0) were lower than simulation participant scores (µ = 6.50/7.0). The differences reached statistical significance for all 6 DASH elements. Debriefers evaluated the ‘usefulness’ of feedback and rated it ‘highly’ (µ= 4.6/5). Conclusion: Basic quantitative data measures collected during debriefings may represent a useful focus for immediate debriefer feedback in a healthcare simulation setting.

References Powered by Scopus

Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: Evaluation results of the medteams project

775Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing

611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation the role of the presimulation briefing

570Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Houston We Have a Problem: How Debriefing Method Impacts Open Communication and the Depth of Team Reflexivity

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Debriefing Assessment in Real Time (DART) tool for simulation-based medical education

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pilot study of the DART tool - an objective healthcare simulation debriefing assessment instrument

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coggins, A., Hong, S. S., Baliga, K., & Halamek, L. P. (2022). Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams. Advances in Simulation, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

36%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free