Evaluation of OraQuick® HIV-1/2 as oral rapid test

17Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As Cameroon scales up its national HIV/AIDS control program, evaluating the performance of commercially available tests for accurate and cost effective diagnostics becomes essential. A cross-sectional study assessed the performance of an HIV oral rapid test. A total of 1520 participants consented to participate in the study. After counselling, they were tested for HIV using the national algorithm followed by OraQuick. Results of the national algorithm were compared to those of OraQuick, for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values. 62% of participants were male, and 1% was reported HIV-positive following the national algorithm. The OraQuick test had 93% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 99.93% NPV and 90% PPV (95% CI, Kappa 0.965). Though more expensive (2-6x) compared to the national algorithm tests, oral mucosal transudate-based test demonstrated good performance. Therefore, it could be implemented in resourceconstrained settings if subsidized and could increase participation since less invasive with no blood accident exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nkenfou, C. N., Kembou, J. E., Temgoua, E. S., Djikeng, A., Mouafo, L. M., Ndzie, E. N., … SanouSobzé, M. (2013). Evaluation of OraQuick® HIV-1/2 as oral rapid test. African Journal of Infectious Diseases, 7(2), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajid.v7i2.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free