Nonnutritive Sweeteners: Current Use and Health Perspectives

Abstract

A 2009 American Heart Association scientific statement titled “Dietary Sugars Intake and Cardiovascular Health” (1) concluded that current intake of added sugars among Americans greatly exceeds discretionary calorie allowances based on the 2005 U.S.Dietary Guidelines (2). For this reason, the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee recom- mended population-wide reductions in added sugars intake.The present statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association ad- dresses the potential role of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) in helping Americans to adhere to this recommendation in the context of current usage and health perspectives. By definition,NNS,otherwise re- ferred to as very low-calorie sweeteners, artificial sweeteners, noncaloric sweeten- ers, and intense sweeteners, have a higher intensity of sweetness per gram than caloric sweeteners such as sucrose, corn syrups, and fruit juice concentrates. As a caloric sweetener replacement, they are added in smaller quantities; hence, they provide no or few calories. In our current food supply, NNS are widely used in thousands of beverages and other food products such as diet soft drinks, yogurts, desserts, and gum. Food manufacturers often use a blend ofNNS or use a blend of sugar and NNS to improve the flavor acceptability of NNS. In developing this scientific statement, the writing group reviewed issues pertaining to NNS in the context of data on consumer attitudes, consumption patterns, appetite, hunger and energy intake, body weight, and components of cardiometabolic syn- drome. The objective was to review the literature to determine whether there were adequate data to provide guidance for the use of NNS. The focus of the statement is on the 6 NNS that are described in Table 1. As- partame, acesulfame-K, neotame, saccha- rin, and sucralose are regulated as food additives by the U.S. Food and Drug Ad- ministration and therefore had to be ap- proved as safe before being marketed. Regarding stevia, at this time, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not made a determination as to the Gener- ally Recognized As Safe status, but has issued no objection letters for a number of Generally Recognized As Safe notifica- tions for stevia sweeteners (http://www. fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/ GenerallyRecognizedasSafeGRAS/ GRASNotificationProgram/default.htm). Because all 6 of these NNS have current U.S. Food and Drug Administration ap- proval, issues related to safety of these com- pounds are not addressed. In addition, the review of the literature is primarily re- stricted to human studies in which nonca- loric sweeteners are used as a replacement for caloric sweeteners.