Representing variability: The case of life cycle diagrams

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two foundational concepts in biology education are 1) offspring are not identical to their parents, and 2) organisms undergo changes throughout their lives. These concepts are included in both international and U.S. curricular standards. Research in psychology has shown that children often have difficulty understanding these concepts, as they are incon-sistent with their intuitive theories of the biological world. Additionally, prior research sug-gests that diagrams are commonly used in instruction and that their features influence stu-dent learning. Given this prior work, we explored the characteristics of life cycle diagrams and discuss possible implications for student learning. We examined 75 life cycle diagrams from books, including five biology or general science textbooks and 25 specialized trade books focusing on biology for children. We also examined 633 life cycle diagrams from a publicly available online database of science diagrams. Most diagrams failed to show any within-species variability. Additionally, many diagrams had perceptually rich backgrounds, which prior research suggests might hinder learning. We discuss how the design charac-teristics of diagrams may reinforce students’ intuitive theories of biology, which might make it difficult for students to understand key biological concepts in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menendez, D., Mathiaparanam, O. N., Liu, D., Seitz, V., Alibali, M. W., & Rosengren, K. S. (2020). Representing variability: The case of life cycle diagrams. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free