Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: A phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

70Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To compare survival between patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel (Taxol) or paclitaxel/carboplatin (Cp) chemotherapy. Patients and methods: From January 1999 to April 2002, 327 eligible patients with ABC were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion followed by epirubicin (EPI) 80 mg/m2 (group A) or paclitaxel, as in group A, followed by Cp at an AUC of 6 mg × min/ml (group, B) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Results: After a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median survival was not significantly different between the two groups (22.4 months versus 27.8 months, P = 0.25), whereas median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in patients treated with paclitaxel/Cp (8.1 months in group A versus 10.8 months in group B, P=0.04). Both regimens were well tolerated. In total, 39 patients (24%) in group A and 46 (29%) in group B suffered at least one severe side-effect. Quality-of-life assessment and cost analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the paclitaxel/Cp combination is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with ABC in which anthracycline administration has the potential of being harmful. © 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fountzilas, G., Kalofonos, H. P., Dafni, U., Papadimitriou, C., Bafaloukos, D., Papakostas, P., … Dimopoulos, M. A. (2004). Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: A phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Annals of Oncology, 15(10), 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdh395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free