What They Knew of Nation and Empire: Rudyard Kipling and C. L. R. James

  • Westall C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

These citations show C. L. R. James taking up Rudyard Kipling’s imperial imperative to ‘know’, as expressed in the poem ‘The English Flag’, and transforming it into a postcolonial interrogation of cricket, the sport which stood, by the logic of synecdoche, for the authority of the British Empire but became the global game of the formerly colonised. Kipling’s question has become part of common English phraseology and a number of critics have made passing comment on James’s adaptation of it. At the close of his analysis of the postcolonial rewriting of Kim, Bart Moore-Gilbert briefly highlights this relationship, noting that James won and read two collections of Kipling stories as a schoolboy (2002: 55). That a direct line of literary communication can be drawn between the British laureate of high imperialism who bestrode the two centuries of empire and the Caribbean Marxist intellectual whose life and work occupied (indeed aided) the shift from colonialism to post-colonialism may appear surprising. However, as Christian Hogsbjerg has made clear, James repeatedly referenced his encounters with Kipling’s short stories, described Kipling’s importance to the imperial (literary and popular) imaginary of England, and indicated his appreciation of Kipling as a writer at once within but not entirely restricted by the narrow bounds of English nationalism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westall, C. (2010). What They Knew of Nation and Empire: Rudyard Kipling and C. L. R. James. In Kipling and Beyond (pp. 165–184). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290471_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free