Dieting and restrained eating as prospective predictors of weight gain

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
231Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research in normal weight individuals paradoxically suggests that measures of attempted eating restriction might represent robust predictors of weight gain. This review examined the extent to which measures of dieting (e.g., self-reported weight loss dieting in the past year) and dietary restraint (e.g., the Cognitive Restraint scale from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire) have prospectively predicted weight change. We located and reviewed 25 prospective studies containing 40 relevant comparisons. Studies were limited to those in which participants were non-obese (with a mean BMI between 18.5 and 30) and averaged at least 12 years old. Neither measure predicted future weight loss. Fifteen of the 20 comparisons (75%) that examined measures of dieting significantly predicted future weight gain whereas only 1 of 20 (5%) that examined restrained eating measures did so. Two plausible explanations for these findings are that: (1) dieters and restrained eaters do not differ in terms of an underlying proneness toward weight gain, but restrained eating represents a more effective means of preventing it; and (2) normal weight individuals who diet do so because they are resisting a powerful predisposition toward weight gain which dieting ultimately fails to prevent. Recent dieting in non-obese individuals may be a valuable proxy of susceptibility to weight gain. This easily assessed characteristic could identify individuals for whom obesity prevention interventions would be particularly appropriate. © 2013 Lowe, Doshi, Katterman and Feig.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lowe, M. R., Doshi, S. D., Katterman, S. N., & Feig, E. H. (2013). Dieting and restrained eating as prospective predictors of weight gain. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00577

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 106

76%

Researcher 26

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 59

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 36

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 30

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 72
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 148

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0