Norway: Public debate and the management of petroleum resources and revenues

8Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter assesses the importance of civil society involvement and public debate for Norwegian petroleum governance. It finds that during the early years of the country’s oil and gas development, the most important choices were made by a small number of decision-makers in government with little input from the rest of society. The attitude of government officials was therefore decisive for Norway’s early successes. During the two first decades of Norway’s petroleum era, also economists at the Ministry of Finance, the Norwegian School of Economics, Statistics Norway and the University of Oslo played important roles. One of the greatest successes of Norwegian oil and gas governance, the sovereign wealth fund, was created by technocrats in interaction with politicians. However, over time, and in a way similar to the Netherlands, civil society and public debate came to play more influential roles. What characterizes contemporary Norwegian petroleum governance is that it has many legs to stand on: an active and diverse civil society, free and diverse media, many political parties representing differing interests, numerous institutions of research and higher education and, importantly, a strong technocracy inside and outside government. In combination, these legs provide for both reliability and dynamism as Norwegian petroleum governance evolves. Finally, a key aspect of Norway’s Nordic model is constant compromise-which is difficult to achieve in more polarized societies.

References Powered by Scopus

Oil is not a curse: Ownership structure and institutions in soviet successor states

268Citations
122Readers
Get full text
Get full text
86Citations
227Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

15Citations
24Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Russian Oil Companies in an Evolving World: The Challenge of Change

4Citations
20Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Overland, I. (2017). Norway: Public debate and the management of petroleum resources and revenues. In Public Brainpower: Civil Society and Natural Resource Management (pp. 217–245). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60627-9_13

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

71%

Researcher 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

50%

Engineering 3

21%

Energy 2

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 60

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0