The projack: A resampling approach to correct for ranking bias in high-Throughput studies

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The problem of ranked inference arises in a number of settings, for which the investigator wishes to perform parameter inference after ordering a set of $m$ statistics. In contrast to inference for a single hypothesis, the ranking procedure introduces considerable bias, a problem known as the "winner's curse" in genetic association. We introduce the projack (for Prediction by Re-Ordered Jackknife and Cross-Validation, $K$-fold). The projack is a resampling-based procedure that provides low-bias estimates of the expected ranked effect size parameter for a set of possibly correlated $z$ statistics. The approach is flexible, and has wide applicability to high-dimensional datasets, including those arising from genomics platforms. Initially, motivated for the setting where original data are available for resampling, the projack can be extended to the situation where only the vector of $z$ values is available. We illustrate the projack for correction of the winner's curse in genetic association, although it can be used much more generally.

References Powered by Scopus

Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-κB pathways

1202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stein’s estimation rule and its competitors—an empirical bayes approach

682Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Data analysis using stein’s estimator and its generalizations

568Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Selective peak inference: Unbiased estimation of raw and standardized effect size at local maxima

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, Y. H., & Wright, F. A. (2016). The projack: A resampling approach to correct for ranking bias in high-Throughput studies. Biostatistics, 17(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv022

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘19‘20‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

29%

Mathematics 2

29%

Computer Science 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0