Influence of root canal moisture conditions on the bond strength of endodontic sealers to dentin

  • Cabral M
  • Limoeiro A
  • De Martin A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of intraradicular moisture conditions on the bond strength of 3 different endodontic cements in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal. Materials and Methods: 90 single-rooted teeth were instrumented with a reciprocal R#50 file and randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: Dry group: dry canals with absorbent paper tips; Moist group: suction syringe and capillary tip coupled to a vacuum pump; Wet group: aspiration with endodontic suction. The groups were divided according to the endodontic sealer used: AH plus (Denstply), Hiflow (Brasseler) and Bio-c Sealer (Angelus). Obturation was performed using Tagger's hybrid technique with a single cone. The teeth were subjected to the "push-out" test to evaluate the bond strength of the cements. Results: Data were analyzed using the Kolgomorov-Smirnoff normal distribution test and the Mann Whitney U test to compare means within and between groups. The standard error established was 5% at a significance level of 95%. AH plus showed better results regardless of canal moisture conditions. Hiflow showed better bond strength in the dry group compared to the moist group (p=0.023) in the cervical area. Bio-C Sealer showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Moisture conditions affected the bond strength values of endodontic cements. The prevalence of failure moduli was mixed in all root thirds, regardless of the cement used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabral, M. A., Limoeiro, A. G. da S., De Martin, A. S., Fontana, C. E., Pelegrine, R. A., Bueno, C. E. da S., & Rocha, D. G. P. (2022). Influence of root canal moisture conditions on the bond strength of endodontic sealers to dentin. Research, Society and Development, 11(11), e285111133714. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free