Ruling out cardiac failure: Cost-benefit analysis of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP before echocardiography

24Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. To estimate the possible economic benefit of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP to reduce the number of echocardiographies. Methods. Retrospective study in a third-party payer perspective. The costs were calculated from three Swedish counties: Blekinge, Östergötland, and Uppland. Two cut-off levels of NT-proBNP were used: 400 and 300 pg/mL. The cost-effectiveness of the testing strategy was estimated through the short-term cost avoidance and reduction in demand for echocardiographies. Results. The estimated costs for NT-proBNP tests and echocardiographies per county were reduced by 33%-36% with the 400 pg/mL cut-off and by 28%-29% with the 300 pg/mL cut-off. This corresponded to a yearly cost reduction of approximately €2-5 million per million inhabitants in these counties. Conclusion. The use of NT-proBNP as a screening test could substantially reduce the number of echocardiographies in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected cardiac failure, as well as the associated costs. © 2013 Informa Healthcare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrandis, M. J., Ryden, I., Lindahl, T. L., & Larsson, A. (2013). Ruling out cardiac failure: Cost-benefit analysis of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP before echocardiography. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 118(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.751471

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free