Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies

1.8kCitations
Citations of this article
787Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several previous studies have suggested that basic decoding skills may develop less effectively in English than in some other European orthographies. The origins of this effect in the early (foundation) phase of reading acquisition are investigated through assessments of letter knowledge, familiar word reading, and simple nonword reading in English and 12 other orthographies. The results confirm that children from a majority of European countries become accurate and fluent in foundation level reading before the end of the first school year. There are some exceptions, notably in French, Portuguese, Danish, and, particularly, in English. The effects appear not to be attributable to differences in age of starting or letter knowledge. It is argued that fundamental linguistic differences in syllabic complexity and orthographic depth are responsible. Syllabic complexity selectively affects decoding, whereas orthographic depth affects both word reading and nonword reading. The rate of development in English is more than twice as slow as in the shallow orthographies. It is hypothesized that the deeper orthographies induce the implementation of a dual (logographic + alphabetic) foundation which takes more than twice as long to establish as the single foundation required for the learning of a shallow orthography.

References Powered by Scopus

Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading

2352Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding Normal and Impaired Word Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-Regular Domains

2177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition

1798Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory

2135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues

908Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood

898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., Wimmer, H., Leybaert, J., Elbro, C., … Olofsson, Å. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859

Readers over time

‘08‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2503570105140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 337

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 65

13%

Researcher 63

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 47

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 243

52%

Linguistics 103

22%

Social Sciences 94

20%

Neuroscience 31

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 3
References: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0