Consistency of learning bayesian network structures with continuous variables: An information theoretic approach

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider the problem of learning a Bayesian network structure given n examples and the prior probability based on maximizing the posterior probability. We propose an algorithm that runs in O(n log n) time and that addresses continuous variables and discrete variables without assuming any class of distribution. We prove that the decision is strongly consistent, i.e., correct with probability one as n → ∞. To date, consistency has only been obtained for discrete variables for this class of problem, and many authors have attempted to prove consistency when continuous variables are present. Furthermore, we prove that the "log n" term that appears in the penalty term of the description length can be replaced by 2(1+ε) log log n to obtain strong consistency, where ε > 0 is arbitrary, which implies that the Hannan-Quinn proposition holds.

References Powered by Scopus

A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification

41280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Elements of Information Theory

36773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling by shortest data description

4493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

BNC-PSO: Structure learning of Bayesian networks by Particle Swarm Optimization

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dirichlet Bayesian network scores and the maximum relative entropy principle

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theoretical analysis of the BDeu scores in Bayesian network structure learning

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suzuki, J. (2015). Consistency of learning bayesian network structures with continuous variables: An information theoretic approach. Entropy, 17(8), 5752–5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/e17085752

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

23%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

55%

Mathematics 3

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free