Long-term Results of Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia

  • Miyahara T
  • Suhara M
  • Nemoto Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From 2001 to 2012, arterial reconstruction was performed in 306 out of 497 limbs (62%) with critical limb ischemia. The reasons for non-vascularization include high operative risk (36%), extended necrosis or infection (20%), and technical issues (15%). Cumulative patency and limb salvage in collagen disease were significantly worse compared to arteriosclerosis obliterans. Cumulative limb salvage, amputation free survival (AFS), and major adverse limb event and perioperative death (MALE + POD) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were significantly worse compared to patients without ESRD, but not significant with regards to graft patency. Our finding suggests that aggressive arterial reconstruction provides satisfactory long-term results in critical limb ischemia so long as case selection for revascularization is properly made. (This article is a translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol 2014; 54: 5-11.).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyahara, T., Suhara, M., Nemoto, Y., Shirasu, T., Haga, M., Mochizuki, Y., … Watanabe, T. (2014). Long-term Results of Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia. The Journal of Japanese College of Angiology, 54(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.7133/jca.13-00044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free