Performance Comparison of Two Controllers on a Nonlinear System

  • Mapoka K
  • Zuva T
  • Masebu H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Various systems and instrumentation use auto tuning techniques in their operations. For example, audio processors, designed to control pitch in vocal and instrumental operations. The main aim of auto tuning is to conceal off-key errors, and allowing artists to perform genuinely despite slight deviation off-key. In this paper two Auto tuning control strategies are proposed. These are Proportional, Integral and Derivative (PID) control and Model Predictive Control (MPC). The PID and MPC controller's algorithms amalgamate the auto tuning method. These control strategies ascertains stability, effective and efficient performance on a nonlinear system. The paper test and compare the efficacy of each control strategy. This paper generously provides systematic tuning techniques for the PID controller than the MPC controller. Therefore in essence the PID has to give effective and efficient performance compared to the MPC. The PID depends mainly on three terms, the P () gain, I () gain and lastly D () gain for control each playing unique role while the MPC has more information used to predict and control a system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mapoka, K. O. M., Zuva, T., Masebu, H., & Zuva, K. (2013). Performance Comparison of Two Controllers on a Nonlinear System. International Journal of Chaos, Control, Modelling and Simulation, 2(3), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijccms.2013.2302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free