Ursachen des Rechtsextremismus. Eine Programmatik für die sozialwissenschaftliche forschung in der schweiz

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay wants to indicate elements of a possible approach in forthcoming Swiss social research that could be useful to analyze xenophobic right wing violence and may well be of assistance in the further civilizing and democratization process of modern societies. Working with a limited concept of right wing extremism, different current research approaches in social sciences are taken into attention. Especially those research questions have to be underscored which gave a relevant contribution to the understanding and possibly to the solution of right wing extremism as a social phenomenon. © 2003 The Swiss Political Science Review.

References Powered by Scopus

Explaining the rise of racist and extreme right violence in Western Europe: Grievances or opportunities?

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development, patterns and causes of violence against foreigners in germany: Social and biographical characteristics of perpetrators and the process of escalation

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radical right parties in europe and anti-foreign violence: A comparative essay

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism

2055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market

800Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The radical right in the ALPS: Evolution of support for the Swiss SVP and Austrian FPÖ

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’amato, G. (2003). Ursachen des Rechtsextremismus. Eine Programmatik für die sozialwissenschaftliche forschung in der schweiz. Swiss Political Science Review, 9(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2003.tb00414.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

62%

Arts and Humanities 2

15%

Psychology 2

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free