Associations of obesity measures with subtypes of ischemic stroke in the ARIC study

45Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Associations between obesity and lacunar, nonlacunar thrombotic, and cardioembolic stroke are not firmly established. Methods: Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were recorded at baseline between 1987 and 1989 in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study for 13 549 black and white adults who were aged from 45 to 64 years and had no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The incidence of ischemic stroke subtypes was ascertained from surveillance of hospital records over a median follow-up of 16.9 years. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, education, smoking status and cigarette years, usual ethanol intake, and leisure time sports index were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Results: The ARIC sample at baseline was 43.8% men and 27.3% blacks; mean age was 53.9 years. Mean BMI, waist circumference, and WHR were 27.7 kg/m2, 96.8 cm, and 0.92, respectively. The associations of lacunar (n = 138), nonlacunar (n = 338), and cardioembolic (n = 122) ischemic stroke incidence with obesity measures were all generally positive and linear. The HRs for the highest versus lowest quintile of the 3 obesity measures ranged from 1.43-2.21 for lacunar stroke, 1.90-2.16 for nonlacunar stroke, and 2.37-2.91 for cardioembolic stroke. Conclusions: Although different pathophysiological mechanisms may exist, the incidences of lacunar, nonlacunar, and cardioembolic stroke were all significantly positively associated with the degree of obesity, regardless of the measure used. © 2010 by the Japan Epidemiological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yatsuya, H., Yamagishi, K., North, K. E., Brancati, F. L., Stevens, J., & Folsom, A. R. (2010). Associations of obesity measures with subtypes of ischemic stroke in the ARIC study. Journal of Epidemiology, 20(5), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20090186

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free