Utilidad de las Escalas de Gradación en el Tratamiento Quirúrgico de Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Cerebrales

  • Gallardo F
  • Martin C
  • Chang L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are a complex disease responsible for up to 38% of hemorrhages in patients between 15-45 years old, carrying every bleeding episode a 25-50% risk of morbidity and a 10-20% of mortality. The therapeutic decision in a patient with an AVM needs to consider both the risks of the intervention and the risks of the natural evolution of the disease. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of different AVM grading scales in predicting surgical risks according to our experience in a case serie. Material and Method: A literature review of the AVM grading scales was made, through Pubmed including as key words “brain arteriovenous malformations” and “grading scale”. A retrospective analysis was made of patients with AVM who were operated in our institution, they were classified according to the scales and their results were compared. Results: 90 patients were operated in our institution with AVM. Retrospectively, they were classified according to the Spetzler-Martin (SM), Spetzler-Ponce (SP), Lawton supplementary, and the sub-classifications in AVM grade 3, from Lawton and de Oliveira. Good outcome were considered when modified Rankin Scale (mRs) was equal or less than 2. The follow-up ranged from 12-48 months, having good outcome in 100% of AVM SM grade I, 91,7% grade II, 80% in grade III and 42,9% in grade IV. Using the SP scale, 93,7% of good outcome in grade A, 80% in grade B and 42,9% in grade C. In the sub-classification of AVM SM 3, we found 84% of good outcome in type 3A de Oliveira and 71,3% in type 3B. According to the Lawton scale, good outcome were found in 92% in type 3-, 72,1% in type 3+ and 60% in type 3. Using Lawton supplementary scale combined with SM, there were 100% of good outcome in grades II and III, 85,7% in grade IV, 87,6% in grade V, 80% in grade VI, 75% in grade VII, 66,6% in grade VIII. Conclusion: In our serie, we reaffirm the effectiveness to predict surgical risk of the following scales: SM, SP and the Lawton’s sub-classification of AVM grade 3. Specially, the use of the supplementary Lawton-Young scale in the surgical treatment of bleeding AVMs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallardo, F., Martin, C., Chang, L., Diaz, J. F., Bustamante, J., & Rubino, P. (2019). Utilidad de las Escalas de Gradación en el Tratamiento Quirúrgico de Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Cerebrales. Surgical Neurology International, 10, S46–S57. https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_454_2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free