Comparison of treatment with imipenem vs. Ceftazidime as a predisposing factor for nosocomial acquisition of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A historical cohort study

39Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Imipenem is considered to confer greater risk for the acquisition of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia than are other β-lactam antibiotics. We conducted a historical cohort study to directly compare the risks of S. maltophilia acquisition in patients treated with imipenem vs. ceftazidime during a 2-year period; 843 hospitalizations of 759 patients treated with ceftazidime (465 hospitalizations), imipenem (294), or both agents (84) were included. Acquisition, as measured by clinical detection, occurred in 24 hospitalizations. Rates of acquisition did not significantly differ between the imipenem and ceftazidime groups (3.7 vs. 7.1 cases per 10,000 patients days; P = .2). In contrast, patients treated with both agents had higher acquisition rates (19 cases per 10,000 patient days; P = .002). Thus, patients treated with imipenem are not at significantly higher risk for S. maltophilia acquisition than those treated with ceftazidime. The excessive risk for patients treated with both agents may be related in part to longer antibiotic therapy and a longer hospital stay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carmeli, Y., & Samore, M. H. (1997). Comparison of treatment with imipenem vs. Ceftazidime as a predisposing factor for nosocomial acquisition of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A historical cohort study. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 24(6), 1131–1134. https://doi.org/10.1086/513652

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free