The Transcendental Necessity of Morality

  • HEATH J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

David Gauthier tries to defend morality by showing that rational agents would choose to adopt a fundamental choice disposition that permits them to cooperate in prisoner's dilemmas. In this paper, I argue that Gauthier, rather than trying to work out a prudential justification for his favored choice disposition, should opt for a transcendental justification. I argue that the disposition in question is the product of socialization, not rational choice. However, only agents who are socialized in such a way that they acquire a disposition of this type could acquire the capacity to use language. Given the internal connection between language and thought, this means that no agent endowed with such a disposition could rationally choose to adopt another. Thus rational reflection by moral agents upon their own fundamental choice disposition will have no tendency to destabilize it. “It is a necessary truth that people tend to do what they think they ought to do, for it is a necessary truth that people who occupy a linguistic position which means / ought to do A now , tend to do A. If they did not, the position they occupy could not mean I ought to do A now.” Wilfrid Sellars, “Some Reflections on Language Games.”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

HEATH, J. (2003). The Transcendental Necessity of Morality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(2), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00295.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free