Dissecting Between-Plant and Within-Plant Wage Dispersion: Evidence from Germany

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Using rich linked employer–employee data for (West) Germany between 1996 and 2014, we conduct a decomposition analysis based on recentered influence function (RIF) regressions to analyze the relative contributions of various plant and worker characteristics to the rise in German wage dispersion. Moreover, we separately investigate the sources of between-plant and within-plant wage dispersion. We find that industry effects and the collective bargaining regime contribute the most to rising wage inequality. In the case of collective bargaining, both the decline in collective bargaining coverage and the increase in wage dispersion among the group of covered plants have played important roles.

References Powered by Scopus

Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings

2189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: A semiparametric approach

1628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unconditional quantile regressions

1342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Firm Wage Premia, Industrial Relations, and Rent Sharing in Germany

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occupational tasks and wage inequality in West Germany: A decomposition analysis: Occupational tasks and wage inequality in West Germany

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk preferences and training investments

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumgarten, D., Felbermayr, G., & Lehwald, S. (2020). Dissecting Between-Plant and Within-Plant Wage Dispersion: Evidence from Germany. Industrial Relations, 59(1), 85–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12249

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11

73%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

20%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0