Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: Assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions

30Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The following are our take home points: 1. It is essential to ensure high fidelity during early implementation prior to broader dissemination and evaluation. 2. We propose five steps to measuring fidelity during early implementation. – choose a fidelity measure based on a change theory – establish a minimum acceptable fidelity – establish a sampling strategy – choose a practical sample size – create a run chart. 3. We suggest three measurement milestones during early implementation: – two consecutive convenience samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – two consecutive purposive samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – one run chart of 10 purposive samples, each with at least 10 observations, showing stable implementation with median value above the minimum acceptable fidelity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Etchells, E., & Woodcock, T. (2018, January 1). Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: Assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions. BMJ Quality and Safety. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006963

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free