Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: Assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions

30Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The following are our take home points: 1. It is essential to ensure high fidelity during early implementation prior to broader dissemination and evaluation. 2. We propose five steps to measuring fidelity during early implementation. – choose a fidelity measure based on a change theory – establish a minimum acceptable fidelity – establish a sampling strategy – choose a practical sample size – create a run chart. 3. We suggest three measurement milestones during early implementation: – two consecutive convenience samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – two consecutive purposive samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – one run chart of 10 purposive samples, each with at least 10 observations, showing stable implementation with median value above the minimum acceptable fidelity.

References Powered by Scopus

The run chart: A simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes

407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: A systematic review

361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation of treatment protocols in the diabetes control and complications trial

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tracking workflow during high-stakes resuscitation: The application of a novel clinician movement tracing tool during in situ trauma simulation

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Respiratory Therapist-Driven Pathway Improves Timeliness of Extubation Readiness Assessment in a Single PICU

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can SBAR be implemented with high fidelity and does it improve communication between healthcare workers? A systematic review

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Etchells, E., & Woodcock, T. (2018, January 1). Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: Assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions. BMJ Quality and Safety. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006963

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

70%

Researcher 7

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 28

46%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

34%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

11%

Social Sciences 5

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free