Abduction in one intelligence test. Types of reasoning involved in solving raven’s advanced progressive matrices

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Given that Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) as an intelligence test with robust psychometric properties is considered to be a good measure of reasoning ability component of general intelligence, particularly its fluid factor, one would expect that uncovering the determinants of APM performance, especially reasoning patterns, could significantly contribute to understanding of intelligence. Our aim in this study was to identify types of reasoning processes involved in solving Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices test. To this end we carried out two studies: one involving eliciting verbal protocols in the form of Socratic tutorial dialogues and one involving controlling eye-fixation patterns. Results suggest that hypotheses generation and testing, involved in solving APM tasks, essentially amounts to abductive reasoning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kisielewska, M., Urbański, M., & Paluszkiewicz, K. (2016). Abduction in one intelligence test. Types of reasoning involved in solving raven’s advanced progressive matrices. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 27, pp. 419–435). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free