Bridging Archaeology and Genetics

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the 1980s, the application of molecular methods to archaeological questions has seen a rapid expansion in the last three decades, addressing major research topics including human origins and migrations, domestication and chronology. The recent introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionised the field, allowing for a larger amount of data to be generated quickly and at ever-decreasing costs. With such techniques now available, it is crucial for a clear and comprehensive dialogue to be established between archaeologists and geneticists. In the following paper, we first review the history of archaeogenetics before addressing some of the major misconceptions that remain commonly widespread across audiences. These include the misconception that genetics can reconstruct full phenotypes or that modern populations can be solely used to retrace a species’ origin or domestication. After exploring the current potential of genetics applied to archaeology through successful case studies, we highlight practical considerations when undertaking archaeogenetic research including sample status and selecting adequate genetic markers and methods. Finally, we suggest ways of bridging the gap between both disciplines so as to allow better collaborations in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lebrasseur, O., Ryan, H., & Abbona, C. (2018). Bridging Archaeology and Genetics. In Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology (pp. 111–132). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75082-8_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free