Complexity, reductionism and the biomedical model

44Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the idea of complexity. While this concept is widely used, its meaning and interpretation usually remain implicit. We show that a mereological view, in which complexity is seen as composition of multiple unchanged parts, motivates an investigation that starts from the separation of causal factors, and their investigation in isolation. In contrast, we propose what we call ‘genuine complexity’, in which the parts of a whole not only compose and interact, but also change each other through such interaction. This, however, requires that we start an investigation from the higher level of complexity: by observing the whole. At such a level, indeed, it is possible to focus on interactions between context, lived experience and physical body parts. Several clinicians, globally, are pushing for a change in this direction. An ecological shift in medicine, we argue, will be not only necessary, but also unavoidable, if we acknowledge that human biology is genuinely complex, and we truly reflect on the meaning and implications of this.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rocca, E., & Anjum, R. L. (2020). Complexity, reductionism and the biomedical model. In Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient: A CauseHealth Resource for Healthcare Professionals and the Clinical Encounter (pp. 75–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41239-5_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free