Noninvasive small rodent imaging: Significance for the 3R principles

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Minimizing potential pain and distress as well as the number of animals in biomedical experimentation and in the drug discovery and development process is not only a moral imperative but also a challenging and evolving area of research. Non-invasive imaging can refine procedures by using alternative readouts which represent early disease state or adverse drug effects and which allow harmful progress to be detected. This in contrast to animals being sacrificed at given time points and using artificial peri-or postmortem endpoints. In many instances non-invasive imaging may replace pathohistological assessment of disease progression with anatomic and functional readouts. Furthermore, the number of animals can be substantially reduced by using each animal as its own control, thereby improving statistical power and information that may relate better to that observed in the clinical assessment of therapy efficacy.Taking as basis some of our own activities in the area of preclinical lung research, we illustrate how imaging can contribute to the principles of humane experimental techniques outlined by Russell and Burch in 1959. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beckmann, N., & Maier, P. (2011). Noninvasive small rodent imaging: Significance for the 3R principles. In Small Animal Imaging: Basics and Practical Guide (pp. 47–57). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12945-2_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free