Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index

95Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This prospective study assessed whether respiratory variations in velocity time integral, peak blood flow velocity and non-invasive pleth variability index are useful measurements in infants undergoing congenital heart surgery and determined threshold values that may help guide fluid administration. In 27 infants receiving mechanical ventilation, of mean (SD) weight 10.4 (6.3) kg, 13 increased their stroke volume index ≥ 15% following a fluid challenge and 14 did not. The best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was for the echocardiographic-derived variables respiratory variation in blood peak flow velocity (area under the ROC curve = 0.92; p = 0.0002) and respiratory variation of the velocity time integral (area under the ROC curve = 0.84; p = 0.002). The pleth variability index also predicted fluid responsiveness (area under the ROC curve = 0.79; p = 0.01), in contrast to heart rate (area under the ROC curve = 0.53; p = 0.75) and central venous pressure (area under the ROC curve = 0.57; p = 0.52). © 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

186Citations
256Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

101Citations
249Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renner, J., Broch, O., Gruenewald, M., Scheewe, J., Francksen, H., Jung, O., … Bein, B. (2011). Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index. Anaesthesia, 66(7), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06715.x

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

49%

Researcher 14

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 63

85%

Engineering 4

5%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

5%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0