Serum biochemical and hematologic values of normal and Mycobacterium bovis-infected American bison

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hematologic and serum biochemical tests were used to monitor the health of 3 groups of bison in an experimental study of tuberculosis. Bison were randomly assigned to Mycobacterium bovis-infected, M. bovis -sensitized, and uninfected control groups. Hematologic measurements included total and differential leukocyte counts, hemoglobin (Hb), packed cell volume (PCV), fibrinogen, and plasma proteins. Biochemical tests included serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, aspartate amino transferase, sorbitol dehydrogenase, serum calcium, and serum phosphorus. There were no significant differences (P = 0.05) in any test values between groups of bison. The bison data were combined and compared to similar data of cattle. The mean values for PCV and Hb were higher than values (PCV 24–46%, Hb 8–15 g/dl) for cattle. Mycobacterium bovis -infected bison had a slight increase in the number of blood monocytes and lymphocytes when compared to the uninfected bison but were within the normal ranges for bison and cattle. Other hematologic parameters were within normal ranges reported for cattle. Creatinine levels in all bison were above the normal range (1.0–1.5 mg/dl) for cattle. Phosphorus levels for M. bovis-infected and M. bovis -sensitized bison exceeded the normal range (5.6–8.0 mg/dl) reported for cattle. The level for uninfected bison was near the upper limit of normal for cattle. Mean values for other serum biochemical tests were within the normal ranges reported for cattle. © 1989, American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, L. D., Thoen, C. O., Throlson, K. J., Himes, E. M., & Morgan, R. L. (1989). Serum biochemical and hematologic values of normal and Mycobacterium bovis-infected American bison. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1(3), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063878900100304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free