38 False activation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not a benign phenomenon

  • Chaudhry U
  • Mavroudis C
  • Rakhit R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion option for an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Since 2005 24/7 PPCI is the first line treatment for an acute STEMI in our centre. 93% of patients are direct admissions by London Ambulance but a proportion (up to 20%) do not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for STEMI and are termed "false activations". Data on the outcome of this cohort is limited. Aim: To review the clinical outcome of patients presenting to our centre with false activation PPCI. Method: From January 2008 until October 2010, we identified 209 false PPCI activations defined as incomplete diagnostic criteria for acute STEMI: absence of STEMI: management and outcome 871 chest pain and/or ECG features (ST elevation or new LBBB). Data was collected via a "false activation" database together with review of case records. Results: 165 cases had complete data. Mean age was 67 with 71% male and 29% female. Mean length of stay was 4 days (range 1-33). 71% presented with chest pains and 29% had no chest pains, but had dyspnoea, palpitations or syncope. The ECG abnormality was non-specific ST-T changes in 22%, 19% LBBB, 15% left ventricular hypertrophy, 14% fixed ST elevation or Q waves, 10% early repolarization, 8% RBBB and 12% other ECG changes. The final diagnosis was non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) in 19%, sepsis in 19% and congestive heart failure (CHF) in 15%. 8% stable angina and 7% syncope. Musculoskeletal or non-cardiac chest pains in 8% and 7% respectively. Pulmonary embolism in 2% and in 5% a gastric cause was diagnosed. 14% had other cardiac problems; arrhythmia, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertension, pericarditis, pericardial effusion and late presentation STEMI. 15% had other diagnoses. Mean follow-up was 18.7 months during which 21.5% of false activation admissions died (n=45). 25% (n=11) died during index admission and 33% (n=15) died within 30 days of admission. Overall 30 day mortality for false activations was 7.2%, which is higher than the overall PPCI mortality of 6.0% (including cardiogenic shock) [p=0.008] and 3.3% (excluding shock) [p<0.0001] in our centre. 49% of deaths were cardiac, 29% sepsis and 22% other causes. The mean age for this group was 83. Conclusion: Patients presenting with false PPCI activation have a high observed mortality. This is probably due to co-morbidities, including occult cardiac disease. Thus, false PPCI activation is not a benign phenomenon and masks underlying significant disease. Robust pathways are required to minimise delay in further investigations and a need for risk stratification for NSTEACS presentations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaudhry, U., Mavroudis, C., & Rakhit, R. D. (2011). 38 False activation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not a benign phenomenon. Heart, 97(Suppl 1), A27–A27. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300198.38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free