Violence: Reflections about a word

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The starting point for my reflections about the word violence comes perhaps unexpected. In his book Kindly Inquisitors, the journalist and philosopher Jonathan Rauch outlines a radical defense of free inquiry against all forms of censorship, whether traditionally authoritarian or rooted in the modern notion of political correctness. This defense of free inquiry leads him to oppose all possible restrictions on verbal expression. In a chapter entitled The Humanitarian Threat he reviews measures, proposed and devised, against assaultive speech, quoting a professor who had stated To me, racial epithets are not speech. They are bullets. Rauch's reaction is eloquent and uncompromising: you do not have to be Kant to see what comes after 'offensive words are bullets': if you hurt me with words, I reply with bullets, and the exchange is even. © 2008 Springer-Verlag New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spierenburg, P. (2008). Violence: Reflections about a word. In Violence in Europe (pp. 13–25). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74508-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free