Intraoperative renal duplex sonography: A valuable method for evaluating renal artery reconstructions

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the ability of duplex sonography to intraoperatively detect technical problems with renal artery reconstructions. Design: Retrospective evaluation of a standard protocol. Patients and methods: The outcome of intraoperative duplex was compared with postoperative angiography, surface duplex, MRA, echo or direct inspection in case of re-exploration in 77 renal artery reconstructions in 62 patients. These included six extracorporeal reconstructions, eight and 17 reconstructions with an artery and autogenous vein respectively, 10 renal artery re-implantations in the aorta (prosthesis), 32 endarterectomies and four reconstructions of kidney transplant vessels. Results: Intraoperative duplex was normal in 67/73 reconstructions with sufficient data. In six cases technical problems were revealed by intraoperative duplex and the reconstruction was re-explored. After re-exploration intraoperative duplex was normal in all cases. Confirmatory studies demonstrated normal results in 61/64 reconstructions with normal intraoperative duplex and abnormal results in 6/6 reconstructions with technical problems revealed by intraoperative duplex. Three reconstructions with normal intraoperative duplex occluded as demonstrated by angiography less than 2 weeks after surgery. Conclusions: Renal duplex sonography is a valuable method available for intraoperative detection of technical problems. Haemodynamic duplex data were less important than B-mode imaging in discriminating between normal and abnormal reconstruction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Weel, V., Van Bockel, J. H., Van Wissen, R., & Van Baalen, J. (2000). Intraoperative renal duplex sonography: A valuable method for evaluating renal artery reconstructions. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 20(3), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2000.1168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free