Experiments on deaerating granular flows and implications for pyroclastic flow mobility

40Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Granular flows were generated by the release of beds of particles in various fluidized states, which then deaerated in a horizontal channel. We described characteristics of the flows and their deposits. Morphological similarities between deposits in experiments and in the field suggest that pyroclastic flow deposits form from a fluidized mixture. The experiments show that slightly expanded, fluidized flows are more mobile than non-fluidized flows of equivalent volume and material composition. They travel to a fixed distance from their source, which depends only weakly on their initial degree of fluidization. Flows of fine particles (<100 μm) deaerate slowly and are highly mobile. Pyroclastic flows commonly have large amounts of fine ash, which may have a controlling influence on their high mobility.

References Powered by Scopus

Types of gas fluidization

3142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows

429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Osceola Mudflow from Mount Rainier: Sedimentology and hazard implications of a huge clay-rich debris flow

324Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Axisymmetric collapses of granular columns

324Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relation between dry granular flow regimes and morphology of deposits: Formation of levées in pyroclastic deposits

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roche, O., Gilbertson, M., Phillips, J. C., & Sparks, R. S. J. (2002). Experiments on deaerating granular flows and implications for pyroclastic flow mobility. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(16), 40-1-40–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014819

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

56%

Researcher 9

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 24

71%

Engineering 8

24%

Energy 1

3%

Computer Science 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0