An easy-to-use machine learning model to predict the prognosis of patients with COVID-19: Retrospective cohort study

44Citations
Citations of this article
201Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Prioritizing patients in need of intensive care is necessary to reduce the mortality rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although several scoring methods have been introduced, many require laboratory or radiographic findings that are not always easily available. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning model that predicts the need for intensive care for patients with COVID-19 using easily obtainable characteristics-baseline demographics, comorbidities, and symptoms. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using a nationwide cohort in South Korea. Patients admitted to 100 hospitals from January 25, 2020, to June 3, 2020, were included. Patient information was collected retrospectively by the attending physicians in each hospital and uploaded to an online case report form. Variables that could be easily provided were extracted. The variables were age, sex, smoking history, body temperature, comorbidities, activities of daily living, and symptoms. The primary outcome was the need for intensive care, defined as admission to the intensive care unit, use of extracorporeal life support, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, or death within 30 days of hospitalization. Patients admitted until March 20, 2020, were included in the derivation group to develop prediction models using an automated machine learning technique. The models were externally validated in patients admitted after March 21, 2020. The machine learning model with the best discrimination performance was selected and compared against the CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and 65 years of age or older) score using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 4787 patients were included in the analysis, of which 3294 were assigned to the derivation group and 1493 to the validation group. Among the 4787 patients, 460 (9.6%) patients needed intensive care. Of the 55 machine learning models developed, the XGBoost model revealed the highest discrimination performance. The AUC of the XGBoost model was 0.897 (95% CI 0.877-0.917) for the derivation group and 0.885 (95% CI 0.855-0.915) for the validation group. Both the AUCs were superior to those of CURB-65, which were 0.836 (95% CI 0.825-0.847) and 0.843 (95% CI 0.829-0.857), respectively. Conclusions: We developed a machine learning model comprising simple patient-provided characteristics, which can efficiently predict the need for intensive care among patients with COVID-19.

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

21544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

20027Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves

8787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trends in US Pediatric Hospital Admissions in 2020 Compared with the Decade before the COVID-19 Pandemic

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Potential applications and performance of machine learning techniques and algorithms in clinical practice: A systematic review

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. J., Han, D., Kim, J. H., Kim, D., Ha, B., Seog, W., … Heo, J. N. (2020). An easy-to-use machine learning model to predict the prognosis of patients with COVID-19: Retrospective cohort study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.2196/24225

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

63%

Researcher 14

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

46%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

22%

Computer Science 13

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free